India's Recycled Plastic Squeeze

Saving the environment doesn't seem like enough motivation for companies to recycle.

At ReadOn, we don’t just report the markets. We help you understand what truly drives them, so your next decision isn’t just informed, it’s intelligent.

---

Every year, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo sell crores of bottles in India. Most of those bottles are PET plastic, the transparent, lightweight material you squeeze when you grab a cold drink from a roadside cooler. And starting this year, the government wants at least 30% of that PET to come from recycled plastic.

Sounds doable, right? After all, India already recycles more plastic than most countries. The problem is, hardly any of that recycled plastic can legally go back into a Coke bottle.

Here’s the thing. When PET bottles get recycled, they typically become polyester fibre for t-shirts, carpets, and cushion stuffing. That’s fine if you’re making clothes. But if you want that recycled plastic to touch food again, to become another Coke bottle, you need a whole different kind of approval. You need the FSSAI (Food Safety and Standards Authority of India) to certify that your recycled plastic is safe for human contact. And as of November 2025, only about a dozen companies in India have that certification.

The total capacity of all FSSAI-approved recyclers? Roughly 200,000 tonnes per year.

The demand for food-grade recycled PET this year, at just the 30% mandate level? Around 350,000 tonnes.

You can see where this is going.

The EPR Promise

Let’s rewind a bit. In 2016, India introduced Plastic Waste Management Rules that introduced something called Extended Producer Responsibility, or EPR. The idea was elegant. If you put plastic into the market, you’re responsible for collecting it back and ensuring it gets recycled. Brands like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Nestlé, Dabur had to either set up their own recycling infrastructure or buy credits from registered recyclers.

But EPR stayed toothless for years. No real targets. No real consequences. That changed in 2022 when the government finally set hard numbers. By FY26, every rigid plastic package (think bottles, containers, jars) had to contain at least 30% recycled content. FY27 would bump that to 40%. By FY29, the target would hit 60%.

The idea was to create a guaranteed market for recyclers. With FMCG giants legally required to buy recycled plastic, companies that had invested in food-grade recycling would finally see returns. Early movers would mint money.

At least, that was the plan.

The Policy Wobble

Then came June 2025. The government released a draft amendment that essentially gave brands a three-year grace period. Miss your FY26 target? No worries, you can carry forward the shortfall until FY29.

For recyclers, this was devastating news. Companies like Ganesha Ecosphere had already committed hundreds of crores to building food-grade rPET capacity. Brands had signed off on supply agreements. Orders were locked in.

And then suddenly, everything went quiet. Brands started delaying orders. Some cancelled outright. Why pay a premium for recycled plastic today if you could push the obligation to FY29?

It was a classic case of regulatory uncertainty torpedoing private investment, which was the one thing India’s recycling sector needed most.

The Ganesha Problem

Consider Ganesha Ecosphere, India’s largest plastic recycler. The Kanpur-based company has been in the business for 36 years. It processes over 450 tonnes of PET waste daily, collected from a network of 300+ suppliers across India. When you hear about kabadiwalas and rag-pickers feeding into the circular economy, Ganesha is often at the other end of that chain.

Historically, Ganesha made its money from recycled polyester staple fibre (rPSF). It’s the stuff that goes into textile filling, yarn, and non-woven fabrics. It commands about 17% of India’s rPSF market.

But textiles are a tough business. US tariffs hit exports. Margins are thin. The real growth story, Ganesha figured, was in food-grade rPET, or recycled plastic that goes right back into bottles. That’s where the EPR mandates would create captive demand. That’s where the margins would be fatter.

So Ganesha invested. Big. It’s currently spending ₹725 crore to nearly triple its rPET capacity from 42,000 tonnes today to 132,000 tonnes by FY27. A brownfield expansion in Warangal (22,500 TPA) should be commissioned this quarter.

And yet, in FY25, Ganesha’s working capital cycle stretched from 42 days to 90 days. Why? Because PET flake prices spiked from ₹42 per kg to over ₹55 per kg as European recyclers hoovered up Indian raw material. Meanwhile, customers delayed payments, wary of the EPR ambiguity.

For a company betting its future on government policy, every regulatory sneeze feels like a hurricane.

The Approval Bottleneck

Even if EPR enforcement tightens tomorrow, there’s a structural problem that won’t disappear. India simply doesn’t have enough food-grade recycling capacity.

Making rPET granules that can touch food isn’t like making polyester fibre. The process requires decontamination technologies that meet global standards. Think USFDA, EFSA (Europe), and FSSAI. The machinery is expensive. The approvals take time.

As of November 2025, here’s who has full FSSAI approval:

A few others have conditional 90-day authorizations. Indorama Ventures, which signed a much-anticipated joint venture with Varun Beverages (India’s largest PepsiCo bottler), has been delayed.

Add it all up, and you get around 200,000 TPA of approved capacity against 350,000 TPA of demand at the 30% mandate level.

Global Benchmarks

India’s situation isn’t unique. Globally, plastic recycling is abysmal. Only about 10% of all plastic ever produced has been recycled. Half ends up in landfills. The rest is incinerated, dumped, or leaks into oceans.

But India’s recycling rate is actually impressive by global standards. Roughly 64% of the 19.6 million tonnes of plastic waste generated annually gets recycled in some form. The catch? Most of that recycling happens in the informal sector, by workers without safety equipment, processing plastic into low-grade applications. The kabadiwalas are efficient, but they’re not making food-grade pellets.

Other countries are tightening their rules too. The US, through Recycled Material Access legislation, is pushing 25% recycled content by CY25 and 50% by CY30, though enforcement varies by state. Europe’s mandate is 25% by CY25 and 30% by CY30 for beverage bottles specifically. India’s 30% target for all rigid plastics is actually more ambitious in scope.

The question is whether the infrastructure can keep up with the ambition.

The FY27 Reset

Here’s the thing about the June 2025 draft amendment. It only softens FY26. The targets for FY27 onwards remain unchanged. So brands get a breather this year, but by next fiscal, they’ll still need 40% recycled content. And they’ll also have to make up any shortfall from FY26.

This creates a curious dynamic. The policy wobble has delayed orders, hurt recycler cash flows, and dented investor confidence. But it hasn’t changed the underlying math. The structural supply deficit remains. Early movers with FSSAI approval still can have an edge.

The Big Picture

India produces nearly 27 million tonnes of plastic annually. By FY29, at 11% CAGR, that’ll cross 40 million tonnes. Most of it will still be single-use. Most of it will still need to go somewhere.

The EPR framework, for all its wobbles, represents a serious attempt to close the loop. It creates a price signal for recyclers, a liability for brands, and theoretically, a business model for the informal sector to graduate into formal supply chains.

But building recycling infrastructure takes time, capital, and regulatory certainty. Right now, India has companies ready to invest, brands willing to pay, and a government that wants to be seen as environmentally progressive. What’s missing is the follow-through, the consistent policy signals that let businesses plan beyond the next quarter.

Until next time, ReadOn!